Catalog score
86.1/100
Public benchmark page for catalog coverage, numeric pricing, source provenance, and channel distribution in the KoreanAds database.
Home
KoreanAds DB Coverage Benchmark
This page explains whether the KoreanAds database is complete enough for real media planning using public metrics.
Total products
1499
Publishers
569
Numeric pricing
46.7%
Source provenance
78.9%
Score components
Taxonomy
28.0
Pricing
9.5
Breadth
30.0
Depth
18.6
Coverage detail
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Publisher normalization | 96.7% |
| Non-generic subtype | 73.6% |
| Non-generic channel bucket | 78.3% |
| Non-generic vertical | 67.0% |
| Canonical pricing model | 70.9% |
| Official / non-aggregator links | 78.4% |
| Source provenance | 78.9% |
| Numeric pricing | 46.7% |
| Numeric minimum budget | 34.1% |
| Price unit | 36.7% |
Latest update 2026-03-24. Manual original-source review queue: 183 pending items.
Distribution snapshot
Top channel buckets
Top media types
Vertical
Remaining gaps
- media_subtype 기타 비중 과다
If you do not know where to start
Top publishers
Top channels
Top verticals
Quality tiers
Frequently asked questions
What does the score mean?
It combines taxonomy quality, pricing coverage, catalog breadth, and strategic-owner depth into one practical DB score.
Why does numeric pricing matter so much?
Media buyers need numeric pricing and minimum budgets to turn a shortlist into a working budget draft quickly.
Why track source provenance separately?
Products with a traced original source are materially more trustworthy than rows that only point to an aggregator page.